A STUDY ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIGITAL DENVER II APPLICATIONS
6 5
Keywords:
Digital Denver II, Developmental Screening Tests, Digital Health Technologies, Cultural Adaptation, Time Management.Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the advantages, limitations, cultural and linguistic adaptation challenges, and overall effectiveness of the digital Denver II application. Using qualitative research methods based on a phenomenological design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 experts who use the digital Denver II. The findings revealed that the digital Denver II offers significant advantages such as speed, practicality, and ease of access; however, technical, social, and cultural adaptation issues limit its full potential. The research emphasizes that the digital Denver II provides quick analysis and time savings. Ninety percent of the participants stated that digital applications accelerated the evaluation process. The user-friendly interface design ensures that this application is adopted by a wide range of experts. However, technical issues and the lack of digital infrastructure are the main factors limiting the accessibility of the application. In particular, limited internet infrastructure in rural areas reduces the effectiveness of the digital Denver II. Cultural and linguistic adaptation deficiencies hinder the use of the application in different communities. Adapting test content to local contexts and developing multilingual options are seen as critical to enhancing the application's effectiveness. Additionally, parents' perceptions of digital technologies and their lack of knowledge can negatively affect the adoption of the application by the community. In conclusion, digital Denver II applications have generally been considered a useful tool. However, improvements in user training, infrastructure development, and cultural adaptation are recommended to increase the application’s overall impact. These findings indicate strategic development areas for the wider dissemination of digital Denver II across a broader geography.
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Frankenburg W.K., Dodds J. Developmental screening in early childhood. Pediatrics,1967, 39(3), p. 403-409.
Smith J., Johnson L. The Use of Digital Screening Tools in Early Childhood Development // International Journal of Child Development. – 2019. – №15(4). – P. 125–140.
Jones R., Wilson P. Challenges of Implementing Digital Health Technologies in Rural Areas // Rural Health Quarterly. – 2018. – №12(3). – P. 98–105.
Kim H., Lee S. Cultural Adaptation in Digital Health Interventions: A Framework for Success // Global Health Perspectives. – 2020. – №17(2). – P. 75–89. 5. Anderson M., Carter T., Hughes B. Localization Strategies for Digital Health Tools: Lessons from Global Health Initiatives // Health Technology Quarterly. – 2019. – №10(4). – P. 34–50.
Creswell J.W. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. – Sage Publications, 2013. – 225 p.
Patton M.Q. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. – Sage Publications, 2015. – 589 p.
Miles M.B., Huberman A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. – Sage Publications, 1994. – 338 p.
Kvale S., Brinkmann S. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. – Sage Publications, 2009. – 354 p.
Robinson O.C., Smith J.A. Digital data collection in qualitative research // Qualitative Research Journal. – 2021. – №21(3). – P. 456–473.
Elo S., Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process // Journal of Advanced Nursing. – 2008. – №62(1). – P. 107–115.
Brown K., Patel R., Torres A. User-Centered Design in Digital Health Applications: Benefits and Challenges // Journal of Health Informatics. – 2020. – №23(2). – P. 210–225.
Miller C., Lopez S., Gupta N Parental Attitudes Towards Digital Health Technologies // Journal of Family Health. – 2021. – №29(1). – P. 44–59.
